The decision in Australia and New Zealand Bank Ltd v Ateliers de Constructions [1967] 1 AC 86 was that the bank had authority to negotiate the cheques payable to Ateliers into the agent's account. This is an example of:
A) Ostensible authority.
B) Express actual authority.
C) Implied actual authority.
D) Apparent authority.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: The reason for the classification of agents
Q2: In what circumstances will Samson be an
Q8: A contract must exist between the agent
Q9: In what circumstances will Adam be a
Q10: In what circumstances will Peter be an
Q12: Which of the following is an example
Q13: Which of the following is NOT a
Q14: Where a principal, by words or conduct,
Q20: Which of the following is an example
Q20: Authority that is conferred by the principal
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents