In relation to 'conduct' under s 18 of the ACL, Clark Equipment Australia Ltd v Covcat Pty Ltd (1987) 71 ALR 367 is authority for the principle that:
A) Pre-contractual representations can constitute misleading and deceptive conduct.
B) An advertisement which compared a competitor's products unfavourably with the advertiser's products can constitute misleading and deceptive conduct.
C) Silence can constitute misleading and deceptive conduct where there is a duty to disclose relevant facts.
D) The act of making a contract containing a false warranty is sufficient to constitute misleading and deceptive conduct.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: Which of the following is NOT one
Q5: In order to establish misleading and deceptive
Q8: Under the Australian Consumer Law definition, a
Q10: Which of the following is classified as
Q11: In relation to 'conduct' under s 18
Q12: What is the main purpose of the
Q12: Allegations of a breach of a specific
Q13: Conduct by a corporation or person in
Q14: Why was the conduct found not to
Q16: Which of the following is NOT covered
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents