Why was the manufacturer found liable in the case of: Drummond v Van Ingen (1887) as App Cas 284?
A) The defect was only minor and the quality was the same as the sample.
B) The cloth was equal to the sample but contained a defect that could not be discovered by reasonable inspection.
C) The cloth was equal to the sample but contained a defect that was discovered on inspection.
D) The cloth did not correspond with the sample.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q25: Under the ACL,a consumer has the option
Q26: Which of the following is NOT a
Q27: In relation to the consumer guarantee of
Q28: If goods can only be used for
Q29: Under the ACL,there is a guarantee requirement
Q31: The legal obligation to ensure that spare
Q32: In relation to the supply of goods,when
Q33: The guarantee of fitness for purpose applies
Q34: Where goods are sold by description,description goes
Q35: What are the implied guarantees that must
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents