The case of Hadley v Baxendale (1854) 9 Ex 341 is authority for the principle that breach of contract entitles a plaintiff to:
A) Damages which are a natural consequence of the breach or expressly bought to the attention of the defendant.
B) Damages that are a reasonably direct consequence of the breach of contract.
C) Damages that are reasonably foreseeable based on the actual or constructive knowledge of the defendant.
D) All of the above.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q5: Rescission is a remedy for breach of
Q5: Which of the following statements is the
Q7: The right to rescind a contract may
Q11: Restitution is a remedy for breach of
Q11: Why was the plaintiff builder successful in
Q13: Which of the following is NOT one
Q13: Why might the innocent party prefer to
Q21: Which of the following statements is the
Q23: Which of the following remedies does NOT
Q36: Which of the following statements is the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents