Courts Traditionally Interpreted Exclusion Clauses Contra Proferentem, or Against the Interests
Courts traditionally interpreted exclusion clauses contra proferentem, or against the interests of the person seeking to rely on it. Why did the courts take this approach, and to what extent has it been displaced by alternative approaches?
Correct Answer:
Answered by Quizplus AI
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q24: Why was the plaintiff successful in the
Q27: Why was the plaintiff unsuccessful in the
Q37: The consumer guarantees under the Australian Consumer
Q39: Explain and distinguish between a condition and
Q40: Which of the following is NOT a
Q41: In relation to exclusion clauses there is
Q42: Which of the following is NOT an
Q43: Why was the council held to be
Q45: If a document containing an exclusion clause
Q46: In order for a party to rely
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents