The beneficiaries in O'Connor v Hart [1985] 1 NZLR 159 were unable to have the contract set aside because:
A) The beneficiaries were not mentally unsound.
B) The beneficiaries were not aware that the farmer was mentally unsound.
C) The beneficiaries could not establish that Hart was mentally unsound and that the other party was aware or should have been aware of this.
D) None of the above.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q25: In respect to beneficial contracts of service
Q26: What is the court's rationale for being
Q27: Under the NSW Act,which of the following
Q28: The common law rules governing minors and
Q29: The NSW Act makes infants liable in
Q31: A person wishing to repudiate a contract
Q32: A contract becomes voidable if a contracting
Q33: In Blomley v Ryan (1956)99 CLR 362:
A)The
Q34: In what circumstances will a person be
Q35: Corporate contracts are enforceable:
A)Against the corporation as
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents