The case of Foakes v Beer (1884) 9 App Cas 605 is authority for the principle that payment of a lesser amount than that already owed:
A) Discharges the debt if accepted by the payee.
B) Is an act detrimental to the payer and therefore good consideration.
C) Is not sufficient consideration for the payee's promise to discharge the debt.
D) Can be revoked at any time by the payer.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: The effect of the rules of consideration
Q3: Which case is authority for the principle
Q6: In which case did the court decide
Q11: Simple contracts must contain a bargain.
Q13: Which of the following is NOT a
Q16: Which of the following is the best
Q17: Which of the following is NOT one
Q19: Which of the following is NOT one
Q20: In which case was the issue of
Q33: Why is consideration important in respect to
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents