The plaintiff in Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v Selfridge & Co Ltd [1915] AC 847 was unable to enforce the defendant's promise because:
A) The promise had been made to Dew & Co.
B) There was no privity of contract between Dunlop and Selfridge.
C) Dunlop had given Selfridge no consideration.
D) All of the above.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q21: Estoppel can only be used as a
Q24: A promise to accept a lesser sum
Q25: Consideration must be present or future,it cannot
Q26: The doctrine of promissory estoppel:
A) Can be
Q27: Future consideration is also known as executed
Q28: Only a promise supported by consideration will
Q32: Consideration must be present in every simple
Q33: Estoppel results in a suspension of the
Q34: Explain what is meant by the expression
Q37: Which of the following would NOT amount
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents