In which of the following cases did the court decide that a husband's promise to his wife to pay her maintenance while they were forced to live apart was not contractually binding?
A) Balfour v Balfour [1919] 2 KB 571.
B) Wakeling v Ripley (1951) SR(NSW) 183.
C) Simpkins v Pays [1955] 1 WLR 975.
D) Shortall v White [2007] NSWCA 272.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Domestic agreements can never be binding.
Q2: The case of Ermogenous v Greek Orthodox
Q2: The existence or an intention to create
Q3: In which type of agreement is the
Q5: A 'rebuttable' presumption is:
A) One which can
Q6: In which of the following cases did
Q12: By including the wording 'this agreement is
Q19: Explain the two legal presumptions that assist
Q25: The law presumes that in social agreements
Q26: In relation to the question of whether
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents