In Shortall v White [2007] NSWCA 272 the presumption against intention was rebutted because:
A) The parties had separated at the time.
B) The agreement would have been against public policy.
C) The promise was made before the relationship had broken down.
D) The promise was made before they were married.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q3: In which type of agreement is the
Q10: In which of the following cases did
Q11: A subjective test is used to determine
Q12: By including the wording 'this agreement is
Q15: In Wakeling v Ripley (1951) SR (NSW)
Q16: Which of the following is NOT one
Q19: Explain the two legal presumptions that assist
Q25: The law presumes that in social agreements
Q26: In relation to the question of whether
Q32: In commercial agreements,the courts presume that the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents