The decision in Australian Safeway Stores Pty Ltd v Zaluzna (1986) 162 CLR 479 means that:
A) Occupiers of property owe a duty of care to anyone who enters their premises.
B) The duty of an occupier varies with the circumstances of a person's entry.
C) An occupier's duty of care is measured by their response to a foreseeable risk.
D) All of the above.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Which of the following statements about product
Q5: In what circumstances will an employer be
Q9: In which case did the High Court
Q10: A person who suffers injury as a
Q18: An action for harm caused by a
Q19: A driver of a vehicle registered in
Q22: For an occupier,where the risk is obvious,the
Q23: Under the civil liability acts, the definition
Q25: A prosecution for criminal negligence means a
Q34: In order to succeed in an action
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents