In Grant v Australian Knitting Mills [1936] AC 85, the manufacturer:
A) Was liable to the customer under the product liability law.
B) Was not liable to the customer for breach of an implied term in the contract.
C) Was not liable because the customer had the opportunity to inspect the product.
D) Was liable for breach of duty of care owed to the customer.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Which of the following statements about product
Q5: A 'non-delegable' duty of care is:
A) Less
Q6: In which case did the House of
Q9: It is easier to take action against
Q10: A person who suffers injury as a
Q12: What is a non-delegable duty of care?
Q14: Following the decision in Esanda Finance Corporation
Q23: What is occupier's liability?
Q26: Under common law,an occupier owes a duty
Q35: Which of the following is NOT a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents