In the case of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court advocated that a "gatekeeper" determine the admissibility and reliability of scientific evidence. This gatekeeper is the:

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The gatekeeper referred to in the Daubert case is the trial judge, who is responsible for determining the admissibility and reliability of scientific evidence presented in court. The judge is expected to weigh the evidence and decide if it meets the standards of scientific validity, which is an important safeguard to ensure that only accurate and reliable evidence is used to support legal arguments. The other options, such as the prosecutor, court clerk, expert witness, and jury, may play important roles in the legal process, but they are not specifically tasked with the gatekeeping function related to scientific evidence.

In the Case of Daubert V