If Dinsburry Company concluded that an investment originally classified as a trading security would now more appropriately be classified as held to maturity, Dinsburry would:
A) not reclassify the investment, as original classifications are irrevocable.
B) reclassify the investment as held to maturity and immediately recognize in net income all unrealized gains and losses as of the reclassification date.
C) reclassify the investment as held to maturity and treat the fair value as of the date of reclassification as the investment's amortized cost basis for future amortization.
D) reclassify the investment as held to maturity, but there would be no income effect.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q26: Which category completely excludes equity securities?
A)Securities available
Q28: The income statement reports changes in fair
Q28: Both fair values and subsequent growth of
Q29: If Ziggy Company concluded that an investment
Q30: If the fair value of a held-to-maturity
Q35: If Dizbert Company concluded that an investment
Q38: What balance sheet amount would Beresford report
Q49: Trading securities, by definition, are properly classified
Q54: For trading securities, unrealized holding gains and
Q57: Holding gains and losses on trading securities
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents