Which of the Following Was the Result on Appeal in J-Mart

Which of the following was the result on appeal in J-Mart Jewelry Outlets, Inc. v. Standard Design, the case in the text in which a creditor of a defunct corporation sued the major shareholder seeking to pierce the corporate veil and hold the shareholder personally responsible for corporate debts after the shareholder paid off his personal credit cards using corporate funds and paid the corporation $1 for a new Cadillac?

A) That insufficient evidence existed that the shareholder controlled the corporation and that the corporate veil could not be pierced.
B) That the corporate veil could not be pierced because the shareholder was not also an inside director.
C) That the corporate veil could not be pierced because the shareholder was not either an insider or outside director.
D) That the corporate veil could be pierced and that evidence supported abuse of the corporate form.
E) That the corporate veil could be pierced regardless of whether evidence of abuse of the corporate form existed because of the unfairness involved.