Which of the Following Was the Result on Appeal in Mary

Which of the following was the result on appeal in Mary Kay, Inc. a/k/a Mary Kay Cosmetics, Inc. v. Janet Isbell, the case in the text in which it was claimed that Mary Kay, Inc. wrongfully terminated Isbell's franchise in violation of the Arkansas Franchise Practices Act on the basis that Isbell used retail store space to sell products as opposed to only conducting sales in customers' homes?

A) That the Arkansas Franchise Practices Act was inapplicable because it applied only to businesses with a fixed geographical location, and the plaintiff's claim of wrongful termination was dismissed.
B) That the Arkansas Franchise Practices Act was inapplicable because insufficient sales were involved, and the plaintiff's claim of wrongful termination was dismissed.
C) That the Arkansas Franchise Practices Act was applicable but that it allowed the franchisor to terminate the agreement.
D) That the Arkansas Franchise Practices Act was applicable and rendered void the contract at issue.
E) That the Arkansas Franchise Practices Act was applicable and rendered voidable the contract at issue based upon the choice of the franchisee.