Which of the following on appeal was the result in DIF Bank Deutsche Investitions Finanz GMBH v. Fluormatic Corporation of America, the case in the text in which the defendant claimed that drafts were not negotiable because they were not payable in a "sum certain" because they were payable in German deutsche marks and did not specify an exchange rate?
A) That the drafts were not negotiable because they were payable in German deutsche marks regardless of whether an exchange rate was specified.
B) That the drafts were not negotiable because they were payable in German deutsche marks and an exchange rate was not specified.
C) That the drafts were not negotiable because they were payable in German deutsche marks, did not specify an exchange rate, and were presented for payment after the exchange rate changed in excess of 5% after the drafts were issued.
D) That the drafts were negotiable but only because they specified an exchange rate.
E) That the drafts were negotiable regardless of whether or not they specified an exchange rate.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q23: With a _ instrument, payment can be
Q24: Which of the following was the result
Q25: Which of the following does not satisfy
Q28: Which of the following is a draft
Q29: What characteristics must a written document have
Q30: Which of the following is false regarding
Q31: Which of the following was the result
Q36: Which of the following is a promise
Q38: With a[n] _ instrument,the payee or subsequent
Q41: If an instrument is silent as to
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents