Which of the Following Was the Result in Hill V

Which of the following was the result in Hill v. Gateway 2000, the case in the text in which the purchaser of a computer failed to read a contract requiring arbitration that came packaged with the computer and asked the court to determine that a seller of computers could not limit buyers' remedies or require arbitration by bundling hardware and legal documents?

A) That the contract was binding on the purchaser because the purchaser accepted the risk of not reading the contract.
B) That the contract was binding on the purchaser because the contract's requirement of arbitration was reasonable.
C) That the contract was binding on the purchaser because the contract's requirement of arbitration was actually in the purchaser's favor.
D) That the contract was unconscionable and nonbinding.
E) That the contract was nonbinding because it should have been provided to the purchaser for review before the computer was shipped.