What Did the Court Rule on Appeal in Alfonso Candela

What did the court rule on appeal in Alfonso Candela v. Port Motors, Inc., the case in the text in which the plaintiff sued the defendant for breach of warranty of title claiming that he was sold a stolen car?

A) That the defendant passed good title so long as the defendant did not know that the car was stolen.
B) That the defendant passed voidable title so long as the defendant did not know that the car was stolen.
C) That a defendant selling stolen goods, regardless of good faith, can never pass a voidable or good title to the buyer.
D) That a defendant selling stolen goods can pass good title to a buyer so long as the buyer and seller were innocent and not in collusion.
E) That a defendant selling stolen goods does not pass good title but that the risk of loss is on the buyer.