Which of the following was the result on appeal in Telekenex IXC, Inc. v. Charlotte Russe Inc., the case in the text in which the defendant claimed that an amendment to a contract for communication services was unenforceable because it was entered into based on a threat that the services would be discontinued otherwise?
A) The court found that the defendant had established a prima facie defense of duress and remanded the case for further proceedings.
B) The court found that the defendant had established a prima facie defense of misrepresentation and remanded the case for further proceedings.
C) The court found that the defendant had established a prima facie defense of undue influence and remanded the case for further proceedings.
D) The court found that the defendant was bound to the amendment because no one forced agreement.
E) The court found that the defendant was bound to the amendment because the defendant had begun performance under it.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: For fraudulent misrepresentation to be the basis
Q2: When a fraudulent misrepresentation is at issue,intent
Q7: When a contract is voidable,it may be
Q10: A mistake is an erroneous belief about
Q11: In the area of mistake, distinguishing between
Q11: Threatening physical harm or extortion to gain
Q12: Undue influence refers to those special relationships
Q15: Which of the following is necessary in
Q19: Which of the following was the result
Q31: Although there are some exceptions, a[n] _
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents