What was the result in Swalberg v. Hannegan, the case in the text in which the minor attempted to disaffirm a contract for the purchase of an automobile?
A) The minor was legally required to restore the other contracting party to his pre-contract position.
B) The minor was not allowed to disaffirm the contract because a vehicle was involved.
C) The minor was not allowed to disaffirm the contract because a contract in an amount over $10,000 was involved.
D) The minor was not allowed to disaffirm the contract because a contract in an amount over $5,000 was involved.
E) The minor was allowed to disaffirm the contract and was not required to restore the other contracting party to his pre-contract position.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q7: Which of the following occurs when a
Q8: In most states a person is given
Q9: Exculpatory clauses are illegal as a matter
Q11: A minor who chooses to disaffirm a
Q12: Historically, which of the following were considered
Q13: In the law when both parties are
Q14: Which of the following is some sort
Q16: Today in all but _ states, a
Q17: Under federal law parents are responsible for
Q19: In most cases,when a minor marries,she or
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents