Which of the Following Was the Result in the Case

Which of the following was the result in the Case Opener, the case in which the plaintiff attempted, almost a year after attaining the age of majority, to disaffirm contracts for aviation courses on the basis that he had entered into the contracts as a minor?

A) That it was unreasonable for the plaintiff to wait so long after attaining the age of majority to attempt to disaffirm and that the contracts would be enforced.
B) That the services were necessaries entitling the defendant to enforcement of the contracts.
C) Both that it was unreasonable for the plaintiff to wait so long after attaining the age of majority to attempt to disaffirm and that the contracts would be enforced and that the services were necessaries entitling the defendant to enforcement of the contracts.
D) That the contracts would be enforced against the plaintiff's parents but not against the plaintiff.
E) That it was not unreasonable for the defendant to disaffirm his contracts almost a year after attaining the age of majority and that the disaffirmance would be allowed.