What Did the Court in the Case in the Text

What did the court in the case in the text, Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc., rule regarding whether the noncompete agreement at issue in the case was enforceable?

A) The court ruled that the noncompete agreement was enforceable because the employee received independent consideration for it in the form of increased wages.
B) The court ruled that the noncompete agreement was enforceable because the employee received independent consideration for it in the form of a fixed term of employment.
C) The court ruled that the noncompete agreement was enforceable because the employee received independent consideration for it in the form of a promotion.
D) The court ruled that the noncompete agreement was unenforceable because the employee did not have sufficient education to understand it.
E) The court ruled that the noncompete agreement was not enforceable because of a lack of consideration.