Yolanda agrees to bathe and groom Wendy's dog, Fluffy, for $20. Yolanda agreed to the price before seeing Fluffy, a very plump, grouchy Pembroke Welsh Corgi dog with lots of hair. Yolanda tells Wendy that if she is going to groom Fluffy, the price will be $30. Wendy agrees although noting that the dog is named "Fluffy." Yolanda bathes and grooms Fluffy, but Wendy will only pay $20. Which of the following is correct regarding Yolanda's entitlement to the extra $10?
A) Yolanda is entitled to the extra $10 because a valid bilateral contract existed.
B) Yolanda is entitled to the extra $10 because a valid unilateral contract existed.
C) Assuming the unforeseen circumstances rule is inapplicable, Yolanda is not entitled to the extra $10 because she had a preexisting duty to bathe and groom Fluffy for $20.
D) Assuming the unforeseen circumstances rule is inapplicable, Yolanda is not entitled to the extra $10 because Wendy's promise to pay $30 was illusory.
E) Assuming the unforeseen circumstances rule is inapplicable, Yolanda is not entitled to the extra $10 because past consideration was involved.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q24: Which of the following is true of
Q25: Which of the following is true regarding
Q26: Courtney, who does not keep up with
Q27: In the case of Smith v. Riley,
Q28: Sally goes to have her hair trimmed
Q30: Which of the following is true regarding
Q31: A[n] _ contract is an agreement whereby
Q32: A[n] _ contract is an agreement whereby
Q33: Under Article _ of the UCC, an
Q34: For a court to enforce a promise,
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents