Suppose a city adopts a zoning ordinance forbidding "adult" businesses within 500 feet of any private residence or school,thereby relegating them to various industrial and commercial areas in the town.Based on Supreme Court decisions to date,this ordinance would most likely be:
A) constitutionally permissible.
B) okay only if each adult business was provided a location where it could make a profit.
C) okay only if a court first ruled that all of the merchandise was legally obscene.
D) a violation of the First Amendment rights of adult businesses.
E) a violation of the rights of adult bookstores but not other adult businesses.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: In 2002,the Supreme Court held that it
Q2: In NEA v.Finley,a 1998 decision,the Supreme Court:
A)upheld
Q3: In City of Erie v.Pap's A.M. ,a
Q5: The Supreme Court in 1969 upheld the
Q6: In its 1997 Reno v.ACLU decision,the Supreme
Q7: The Supreme Court allowed a state to
Q8: The Supreme Court in 2003 upheld the
Q9: The 1987 Pope v.Illinois decision of the
Q10: The 1981 Schad v.Mt.Ephraim decision of the
Q11: In 1973,the Supreme Court again modified the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents