In Branzburg v.Hayes,the Supreme Court held that:
A) contempt of court is possible even if the contemptuous act occurs some distance from the courtroom.
B) contempt citations violate the First Amendment when used to prevent media commentary,unless there is a clear and present danger to the administration of justice.
C) reporters must always testify when ordered to do so by a judge.
D) reporters must testify before federal grand juries,but there may be other times when reporter's privilege exempts them from testifying.
E) all of these.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q6: The Second Circuit in 2011 said that
Q7: In 1991 the Supreme Court held that
Q8: What happened in 2013 that boosted journalists'
Q9: Judith Miller was eventually released from jail
Q10: Indirect contempt of court is most likely
Q11: A shield law did not protect a
Q13: Vanessa Leggett was eventually released from jail
Q14: Judith Miller of the New York Times
Q15: In what state was the reporter's privilege
Q16: If the traditional common law didn't recognize
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents