The Supreme Court held that a city cannot require a permit for door-to-door soliciting for political,religious or other non-commercial causes in the 2002 case of:
A)Thomas v.Chicago Parks District.
B)Frisby v.Schultz.
C)Watchtower Bible and Tract Society v.Village of Stratton.
D)Valentine v.Chrestensen.
E)Lovell v.City of Griffin.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The case of Watchtower Bible and Tract Society v. Village of Stratton is the only one listed that addresses door-to-door soliciting for non-commercial causes. In this case, the Supreme Court held that requiring a permit for such soliciting was a violation of the First Amendment's protection of free speech.

The Supreme Court Held That a City Cannot Require a Permit