Suppose a city passed a law banning demonstrations that target a specific private residence while allowing them on public sidewalks in general.Based on the Frisby v.Schultz case,such a law would be:

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In Frisby v. Schultz, the Supreme Court held that a ban on targeted residential picketing was constitutional because it protected "legitimate interests in residential privacy and tranquility" and did not completely bar all expressive activity in the surrounding public forum. Therefore, a law banning demonstrations targeting a private residence would be unconstitutional under the First Amendment.

Suppose a City Passed a Law Banning Demonstrations That Target