A federal court ruled in 2003 that a city could not ban soliciting and leafletting on a downtown pedestrian mall unless the city could justify it under the strict-scrutiny standard.The case:
A)S.O.C.v.The Mirage.
B)City of Las Vegas v.ACLU.
C)Harman v.City of New York.
D)Venetian Casino Resort v.Local Joint Executive Board of Las Vegas.
E)Costco Companies v.Gallant.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The case mentioned in the question is about a city's attempt to ban soliciting and leafletting on a pedestrian mall, which is a form of free speech protected by the First Amendment. The strict-scrutiny standard requires that any government restriction on free speech must be narrowly tailored to serve a compelling state interest. In this case, the federal court ruled that the city could not justify such a ban without meeting this standard. City of Las Vegas v. ACLU is the only choice that relates to this specific issue.

A Federal Court Ruled in 2003 That a City Could