Paulo survived a car crash without any major injury while not wearing a seatbelt.If he uses this example to prove that seatbelts are not needed,he has failed to test his evidence for
A)consistency.
B)relevancy.
C)recency.
D)credibility.
E)interest.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Paulo's example lacks consistency because it is an isolated incident and does not account for the broader statistical evidence that consistently shows seatbelts significantly increase safety in car crashes.

Paulo Survived a Car Crash Without Any Major Injury While