A moral argument maintaining that it is better not to initiate euthanasia practices since it will likely be too difficult to stop once one has begun to act in these ways is

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

This argument is a classic example of a slippery slope argument, which suggests that initiating euthanasia practices will lead to a gradual decline in ethical standards that will eventually result in more radical and unacceptable practices. The argument is not focused on enhancing individual liberty, nor does it necessarily prioritize the avoidance of suffering or the promotion of autonomy. Instead, it is concerned with the potential consequences of opening the door to euthanasia practices, which may be difficult to control or restrict once they have begun. Ultimately, this argument is founded on the belief that the sanctity of life should not be compromised or undermined, even in cases where suffering or other difficulties may be present.

A Moral Argument Maintaining That It Is Better Not to Initiate