The court is establishing liability in a case in which several actions caused the plaintiff's injury. Which test of causation would be most useful in this case?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Rationale 1: Proximal cause determines how far the liability extends. Fact-of is not a test of causation.
Rationale 2: The but-for test is used to determine if the act or omission actually caused the injury or harm sustained and is not as related to the percentage of cause.
Rationale 3: Substantial factor is considered the best test to pinpoint liability when several causes occur to bring a given injury. This test asks whether the defendant's act or omission was a substantial factor in causing the ultimate harm or injury.
Rationale 4: Fact-of-cause is not a test of causation.

The Court Is Establishing Liability in a Case in Which