An archaeologist discovers new evidence suggesting humans inhabited a particular area long before it was originally believed.Because these results are so novel,if the archaeologist is critically thinking,she should first:
A)critically evaluate the work of other archaeologists who argue the opposite.
B)contact archaeologists who share her views and ask them to evaluate her evidence.
C)begin writing a book on her findings.
D)look for additional evidence that humans inhabited the area that may still be missing.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The archaeologist should adopt a skeptical approach to her findings and continue looking for additional evidence to support her claims. This will help to account for any potential errors or oversights in her research and support her conclusions if they are ultimately found to be true. It is important to remain open to alternative perspectives and continue to gather evidence before drawing final conclusions. Options A and B are also valid strategies, but they are better suited for verifying existing evidence rather than generating new evidence. Option C is premature since the archaeologist has not yet fully evaluated and analyzed all of the evidence.

An Archaeologist Discovers New Evidence Suggesting Humans Inhabited a Particular