A CPA issued an unqualified opinion on the financial statements of a company that sold common stock in a public offering subject to the Securities Act of 1933. Based on a misstatement in the financial statements, the CPA is being sued by an investor who purchased shares of this public offering. Which of the following represents a viable defense?
A) The investor has not proven CPA negligence.
B) The investor did not rely upon the financial statement.
C) The CPA detected the misstatement after the audit report date.
D) The misstatement is immaterial in the overall context of the financial statements.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Most of the burden of affirmative proof
Q3: The results of the Continental Vending Corporation
Q3: Under which common law approach are auditors
Q5: The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 offers
Q6: Assume that $500,000 in damages are awarded
Q8: Under Section 10 of the 1934 Securities
Q9: An auditor knew that the purpose of
Q9: Assume that $500,000 in damages are awarded
Q11: The Ultramares v. Touche case established that
Q14: Jones,CPA,is in court defending himself against a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents