What are the three main logical fallacies in psychological thinking that can predispose us to pseudoscientific beliefs? Describe and provide an example of each.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer is Answers will vary but should contain the points that reflect the following information for full credit.
--Emotional reasoning fallacy.The emotional reasoning fallacy is the error of using our emotions as guides for evaluating the validity of a claim (some psychologists also refer to this tendency as the affect heuristic).If we're honest with ourselves,we'll realize that findings that challenge our preexisting beliefs often make us angry,whereas findings that confirm these beliefs often make us happy or at least relieved.We shouldn't make the mistake of assuming that because a scientific claim makes us feel uncomfortable or indignant,it's necessarily wrong.
--Bandwagon fallacy.The bandwagon fallacy is the error of assuming that a claim is correct just because many people believe it.It's an error because popular opinion isn't a dependable guide to the accuracy of an assertion.
--Not me fallacy.The not me fallacy may be the most widespread and dangerous of all logical fallacies.It's the error of believing we're immune from errors in thinking that afflict other people.This fallacy can get us into deep trouble because it can lead us to conclude mistakenly that we don't require the safeguards of the scientific method.Many pseudoscientists fall into this trap: They're so certain their claims are right-and uncontaminated by mistakes in their thinking-that they don't bother to conduct scientific studies to back up these claims.

What Are the Three Main Logical Fallacies in Psychological Thinking