In a study by Fulero and Finkel (1991) ,mock jurors read one of several versions of a murder trial,with different testimony by expert witnesses.Researchers found that
A) jurors who heard ultimate-opinion testimony were more likely to judge the defendant as not guilty by reason of insanity.
B) jurors who heard testimony on the defendant's ability to understand the wrongfulness of the act were more likely to judge the defendant as not guilty by reason of insanity.
C) jurors who heard testimony on the defendant's mental disorder were more likely to judge the defendant as not guilty by reason of insanity.
D) the type of information from the expert witnesses did not significantly affect the verdict of the mock jury.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q23: How many states have no insanity defense?
A)0
B)3
C)5
D)21
Q24: Competence to stand trial as a "sufficient
Q25: An unusual aspect of the trial of
Q26: In federal trials,an expert witness is allowed
Q27: Which definition of insanity includes two prongs,a
Q29: Which of the following is NOT an
Q30: Which of the following is true?
A)The adoption
Q31: "Distinguishing between right and wrong" is central
Q32: John Hinckley Jr.was acquitted by reason of
Q33: Ted Kaczynski,the Unabomber,
A)pleaded not guilty by reason
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents