A sports commentator believes that a particular basketball player is just awful in road games but relatively effective at home. To test this claim, the commentator takes a random sample of 36 road games and 49 home games and collects the player's scoring output in each game. He finds that in the 49 home games, the player averaged 12.3 points and his scoring output had a standard deviation of 2.6 points. Alternatively, in the 36 road games, the player averaged 8.9 points with a standard deviation of 5.6 points.
A) Specify the competing hypotheses to determine if the player has a higher scoring average in home games.
B) Calculate the value of the test statistic and the critical value at a 1% significance level. There is no reason to assume that the population variance of scoring output is equal for home and road games.
C) Does the evidence support the commentator's claim at the 1% significance level?
Correct Answer:
Verified
...
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q102: A recent Health of Boston report suggests
Q103: A farmer is concerned that a change
Q104: According to a recent survey, women chat
Q105: A student has to decide whether he
Q106: A shoe company designed a low-top and
Q108: According to a recent survey, women chat
Q109: A farmer is concerned that a change
Q110: A new study has found that, on
Q111: In August 2010, Massachusetts enacted a 150-day
Q112: Do men really spend more money on
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents