In one of the Supreme Court's most thorough defenses of the categorical obscenity exclusion,Paris Adult Theatre I v.Slaton,the Court said that
A)there is substantial scientific data demonstrating that obscenity is harmful.
B)scientific data supporting the obscenity exclusion is sparse,but constitutionally sufficient.
C)scientific evidence of harm is unnecessary.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, the Court stated that scientific evidence of harm is unnecessary for the categorical obscenity exclusion. The Court emphasized that the exclusion is based on community standards and the idea that obscene materials are without redeeming social value, regardless of their impact on viewers. Therefore, choice C is the best answer.

In One of the Supreme Court's Most Thorough Defenses of the Categorical