Following World War II,some American politicians and scholars argued that the United States would need to be more involved in world affairs because the United States had a moral obligation to preserve world peace.This argument is an example of:

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The argument that the United States had a moral obligation to preserve world peace is rooted in the idealist perspective, which emphasizes the importance of international cooperation, human rights, and moral principles in foreign policy. Idealism stands in contrast to realism, which focuses on the pursuit of national interests and the balance of power among states. Constructivism emphasizes the role of ideas and beliefs in shaping international relations, while nation-building and containment are specific foreign policy strategies rather than overarching perspectives.

Following World War II,some American Politicians and Scholars Argued That