A marketing researcher was studying the effect of a supermarket display on sales of a new product. There were two designs for the display: the first had greater visual appeal and the second contained more factual information about the product. Each type of display could be made in three sizes: small, medium, or large. Eighteen supermarkets were available for the study, and three supermarkets were selected at random to display each combination of design and size. The number of units of the product sold over a two-week period was recorded for each supermarket. For the resulting data, a two-way ANOVA was run, with the partial ANOVA table given below. Analysis of variance for sales: What conclusion should be drawn from this test?
A) Accept the null hypothesis.
B) Fail to reject the null hypothesis-there is no evidence to suggest that design is more or less likely to influence sales.
C) Reject the null hypothesis-there is some evidence that design influences sales.
D) Reject the null hypothesis-there is strong evidence that design influences sales.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Instructors gave caffeine to fruit flies
Q3: A marketing manager studied the effect
Q4: A researcher wished to compare the effect
Q5: A population of flights can be classified
Q6: A researcher wished to compare the effect
Q7: Instructors gave caffeine to fruit flies to
Q8: A marketing researcher was studying the effect
Q9: A researcher wished to compare the effect
Q10: A researcher wished to compare the effect
Q11: A population of flights can be classified
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents