Kurt, a computer sales representative, ran a small restaurant business from his home to supplement his income. He converted his large living room into an eatery with minimal seating. His mother and brother managed the kitchen, while he coordinated orders and waited upon customers. Upon realizing that Kurt was running a restaurant, the landlord evicted Kurt and his family. In the scenario, we can infer that ________.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The scenario suggests that Kurt was evicted for using the rented property for a non-stipulated purpose, i.e., running a restaurant. The landlord likely had a lease agreement with Kurt that did not allow commercial activities or the use of the property for any other purposes than residential. Therefore, the landlord had the legal right to evict Kurt and his family for violating the terms of the lease agreement. The other options, such as the property being uninhabitable, building code violations, or failing to claim a freehold estate, have no evidence or relevance in the scenario.

Kurt, a Computer Sales Representative, Ran a Small Restaurant Business