A nolo plea or a consent decree is often attractive to antitrust defendants because:
A) the government must prove criminal intent on the defendant's part.
B) it results in an imposition of a penalty without requiring a defendant to remedy his actions.
C) it is not admissible as proof of a violation of the Sherman Act in a private plaintiff's later civil suit.
D) it does not attract the same penalty as a guilty plea or a conviction at trial.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q22: Which of the following situations will justify
Q23: Ojay Corp. ,A-C,Inc. ,and Kato Co.are competitors
Q24: Which of the following antitrust activities can
Q25: Chicago School advocates view _ as the
Q26: All of the gas stations in Smalltown
Q28: In United States v.Colgate & Co.(1919),the Supreme
Q29: LMNOP Corp.has been convicted under the Sherman
Q30: Which of the following statements is true about
Q31: To have standing in a federal antitrust
Q32: Traditional antitrust thinkers argue that:
A)concentrated economic power
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents