Smith and Benson make an oral contract for the sale of some land at a price of $500,000. After paying Smith $400,000 of the purchase price, Benson takes possession of the land. One month later, Smith wants to boot Benson off the land. His argument is that the parties' oral agreement is unenforceable under the Statute of Frauds. Which of the following is most correct?
A) Smith is correct, because the contract is for an amount greater than $500.
B) Smith is correct, because this is an oral contract for the sale of real estate.
C) Smith is incorrect, because the contract is for an indefinite period of time.
D) Smith is incorrect, because Benson paid part of the purchase price and took possession.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q24: Sean made an oral promise to sell
Q27: Why is the contract for the insurance
Q32: Most states' statutes of frauds do not
Q37: Big Bank is a major creditor of
Q38: On May 1,Dix and Wilk entered into
Q39: In order to satisfy the Statute of
Q55: If it is not indicated in the
Q61: A written agreement was signed by two
Q63: Jones goes to a clothing store and
Q71: Ward is attempting to introduce oral evidence
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents