In a case involving an ultrahazardous or abnormally dangerous activity, the plaintiff must prove recklessness on the defendant's part. Any lower fault standard would be unfair to the defendant in such cases.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In a case involving an ultrahazardous or abnormally dangerous activity, the plaintiff does not need to prove recklessness on the defendant's part. Instead, the plaintiff only needs to prove that the activity was abnormally dangerous and that it caused their harm or damages. This is because the defendant is held strictly liable for any harm caused by such activities, regardless of their level of fault or intentionality.

In a Case Involving an Ultrahazardous or Abnormally Dangerous Activity