What is the main argument for avoiding a statute's plain meaning or legislative history, and instead following prior interpretation in a case?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Following prior interpretation promotes stability and certainty in the law, as it allows for consistency in how the law is applied over time. This helps prevent confusion and uncertainty in the legal system. Additionally, plain meaning and legislative history can themselves be subject to debate and interpretation, making reliance on prior interpretation a more reliable approach. Time-saving is not the main argument for following prior interpretation.

What Is the Main Argument for Avoiding a Statute's Plain