If a cyclist is found to be guilty of blood doping and you conclude the all cyclists engage in blood doping practices,you have made a _______________.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The conclusion that all cyclists engage in blood doping practices based on the guilt of one cyclist is a general induction, as it assumes that the characteristics of the specific individual are true for the entire group. It is not a universal induction, as it does not make a claim about all members of a class, but rather the broad group of cyclists. It is also not a specific or broad-based induction, as these would require more specific or extensive evidence to draw a conclusion about a smaller or more specific group.

If a Cyclist Is Found to Be Guilty of Blood