Warren Tee was injured using a hair dryer manufactured by the Whoopee Electrical Products Company. Warren has contacted a lawyer because he feels that Whoopee is responsible for his injury based on the legal principle of:
A) restricted endorsement.
B) fault free obligations.
C) patent infringement.
D) strict product liability.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The legal principle of strict product liability holds manufacturers accountable for their products, regardless of whether or not they were negligent. In this case, Warren Tee's injury resulting from a hair dryer manufactured by the Whoopee Electrical Products Company would likely fall under strict product liability, making Whoopee responsible for his injury.

Warren Tee Was Injured Using a Hair Dryer Manufactured by the Whoopee