A random sample of 30 executives from companies with assets over $1 million was selected and asked for their annual income and level of education. The following table summarized the results:
Using this output, what conclusions can you draw?
A) Since the calculated F-value is smaller than the F-critical value, there is a significant difference in the incomes of these 3 groups.
B) Since the calculated F-value is smaller than the F-critical value, there is no significant difference in the incomes of these three groups.
C) Since the P-value is 0.001, there is a 10% chance of these results happening when there is no significant difference in the incomes of these three groups.
D) Since the calculated F-value is larger than the F-critical value, and the P-value is so small, there is strong evidence to suggest that the three groups with different levels of education do not all have the same incomes.
E) Since the calculated F-value is larger than the F-critical value, and the P-value is so small, there is strong evidence to suggest that all three groups with different levels of education have the same incomes.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q25: A large department store examined a sample
Q26: Two accounting professors decided to compare the
Q27: i. To employ ANOVA, the populations should
Q28: The F test statistic is the ratio
Q29: Analysis of variance is used to:
A) compare
Q31: Which one of the following is not
Q32: Suppose that an automobile manufacturer designed a
Q33: Two accounting professors decided to compare the
Q34: i. The statistical technique used to test
Q35: i. To employ ANOVA, the populations being
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents