Carlos, age 24, and Samuel, age 47, are employed as security officers for Jackson Security Co. In an effort to retain qualified officers and to be more competitive with the salaries offered by the police department, Jackson developed an incentive plan which provided for higher raises for younger officers. As a result, Jackson gave Carlos a higher raise than Samuel. Samuel filed a claim for age discrimination.
A) Jackson will be liable for age discrimination because it treats older workers differently than its younger workers.
B) Jackson will not be liable for age discrimination because the ADEA allows for different treatment when it is based on a reasonable factor other than age.
C) Jackson will be liable for age discrimination because Samuel did not file a waiver.
D) Jackson will not be liable for age discrimination because Samuel was given a raise and his seniority status was not affected.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q3: Bob Hughes is 57 years old and
Q4: Monica, aged 39, is terminated. Her employer
Q5: The ADEA makes it unlawful to publish
Q6: Gibson Foods, Inc. and Thompson Foods, Inc.
Q7: According to Oubre v. Entergy Operations, Inc.
Q9: An employer can escape liability for disparate
Q10: Federal and private sector employees enjoy the
Q11: Terminations pursuant to a legitimate, non-age motivated
Q12: Some circuit courts have recognized a cause
Q13: An employer who raises the "same actor"
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents