Why is there a requirement to prove reliance in order to recover for fraud? Why should the law not penalize a person who knowingly makes a false statement,regardless of whether the person to whom the statement is made can prove reliance? Would there be any practical problems if the reliance requirement were eliminated?
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q66: Donald is looking at a new Porsche
Q67: Bob sees a used car advertised as
Q68: Sam wants to sell his stereo system
Q69: If someone buys a piece of artwork
Q70: Bill sells some old books to Marion
Q72: Betsy told David about some wonderful development
Q73: Sandy Student is having difficulties in her
Q74: Robert is a pastor at United Church.One
Q75: Billy is out in the bars one
Q76: Murphy owned some farmland outside the city.He
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents